Listen to the Insight

Audio generated with Gemini Notebook

The Cost of Being “Right"

Earlier this week, a pastor in Chicago posted a video apologizing to his followers for not showing up emotionally in the way they hoped he would. A few days later, at a debate, a politician refused to apologize for a vote that had severe consequences for millions of Americans.

This isn't about religion or politics. It's about leadership.

Look at the difference. One leader measured himself against what his people experienced. The other defended the reasoning behind his decision.

Most leaders I work with default to defending their intent. When the impact doesn't match their intent, they explain what they meant instead of acknowledging what people experienced.

“That's not what I meant.”

“I never intended for it to land that way.”

Both statements can be true and still miss the point. The people living with the outcome don't experience your intent. They experience the impact.

An apology isn't a confession that your reasoning was flawed. It's an acknowledgment that your intent and your impact landed in different places, and that you take responsibility for the distance between them.

Leaders who can't do that often believe they're protecting their authority. What they're actually communicating is that the leader's account of events outranks everyone else's.

The consequences are predictable. People stop bringing problems forward. They stop telling you when you've missed. You keep the title but lose your followers' trust, your credibility, and the information you need to make strategic decisions.

Let me be clear: You don't have to apologize for every decision, but you do have to acknowledge the cost. Being unwilling to acknowledge the impact can cost you more than being “right” ever gains you.